![]() |
| Nancy & her mom |
![]() |
| Laura Gehl |
![]() |
| Darrin Lunde / Charlesbride photo |
![]() |
| Laura Salas |
![]() |
| Nancy & her mom |
![]() |
| Laura Gehl |
![]() |
| Darrin Lunde / Charlesbride photo |
![]() |
| Laura Salas |
It’s always a treat when an author friend has a new book drop and wants to share it with the GROG. This week’s treat from Jessica Fries-Gaither, a nonfiction picture book, is a trick as well as a treat. Beware… some of the 20 animals featured in So Rude: Animals Behaving Badly, may even keep you up at night! Imagine rude, crude creatures like the Eastern Hognose snake, or Turkey vultures, or a Tongue-eating louse. If I have your attention, just imagine how kinder-middle schoolers will react to this book that shares unique animal behaviors even your Mom would look at in askance!
So Rude: Animals Behaving Badly is engaging “browseable” nonfiction that enables readers to dip in and out of content to focus on what interests them most. This feature is especially helpful for younger readers who may not be ready to tackle longer pieces of text and for school librarians interested in sparking curiosity for research projects. As author, nonfiction expert Melissa Stewart says browseable nonfiction features “eye-catching design, lavishly illustrated along with short blocks of straightforward text.” Fries-Gaither’s newest from Millbrook Press combines unusual facts (Hippos throw their waste around!), compelling photographs, and great book design.
As a practicing science teacher for over 20 years, Jessica Fries-Gaither knows how to entice students and teach about animal behaviors simultaneously. She combines humor and employs the “ick” factor that elementary students love. Back matter with a glossary, further explanation of animal behavior, and list of books for further reading make this a winning book for kids and educators alike.
Craft Chat
![]() |
| Jessica and I met up at the Ohioana Book Festival. |
Kathy: So Rude features so many animals behaving badly. How did you whittle down the list to the 20 most rude for the book? Which animal, in your opinion, has the highest "ick/cringe" factor? (For me, my husband and I agreed it’s the tongue-eating louse! Yikes!)
Jessica: I started my research process by brainstorming a list of rude behaviors (lying, cheating, stealing, etc.) and then looked for animals that exhibited them. That gave me a great place to start, and many of the 20 came from that process. I also tend to bookmark articles I find interesting and think I might be able to use someday in either my writing or teaching, and several animals came from that massive collection.
As for the highest “ick” factor, there’s no competition in my mind. The tongue-eating louse wins that gold medal. Everyone–from my critique group to the team at Millbrook–has commented something along the lines of “EWWWW!”
![]() |
| YIKES! It's the tongue-eating louse! |
Kathy:I love the visual appeal of this book. For new nonfiction writers or those considering writing nonfiction, can you explain the structure idea adding speech bubbles, text boxes, and photographs to shape this book? Did you have input in the design, or did Millbrook Press/Lerner take the lead on this?
Jessica: I think the book is so visually appealing, and that’s all due to the Millbrook Press/Lerner team. The book is part of their photo-illustrated STEM series (the same series that my previous title, Nature’s Rule Breakers: Creatures That Don’t Fit In belongs to), so it was always going to include the captivating photographs. But the speech bubbles and text boxes were all thanks to the talented design team!
Kathy: Tell us about your research process for So Rude: Animals Behaving Badly. I know you'll have some great tips, since you spent last year as an Einstein Fellow at the Library of Congress! What are your favorite go-to science resources?
Jessica: I get a lot of ideas from popular science articles that land in my inbox or come across my social media feed: National Geographic, Science Daily, Live Science, etc. After reading those, I always try to track down the original scientific paper that the article was based on. I have a degree in biology, so making sure I understand the original findings and as many nuances as I can understand is important to me. Just check out my bibliography for the book! But I’m also not above Google searches for terms like “rude animals” when I get stuck! I cast a wide net and then make sure I read well on the specific examples I choose.
Kathy: Review sources state that this book is aimed at preschoolers or readers ages 4-9. Since you're a practicing science educator and I'm a former middle grade teacher and K-12 school librarian, I'm interested in where you see this book fitting in both the curriculum and grade bands. I feel intermediate and middle school students would love this book.
Jessica: If I’m being completely honest, I was really surprised to see that preschool designation in the reviews. Millbrook/Lerner’s series is aimed at grades K-2, to the best of my knowledge, and I knew I was landing on the higher end of that range with some of the vocabulary and technical information I chose to include. In my experience, kids really enjoy the stretch in concepts and vocabulary that a read-aloud can provide, and you can always simplify a read-aloud for younger children.
From a curricular perspective, I think this fits well in both primary and upper elementary grades. The Next Generation Science Standards include Disciplinary Core Ideas around animal behavior in both 1st and 4th grades that align with the examples and message of the book. And while I find that picture books can be a tough sell to middle school students, I think they would definitely enjoy the content!

No one is behaving badly at Cover to Cover Books for Young Readers!
Kathy: So Rude just came out at the beginning of October. How are you celebrating and promoting this book? Tell us about school visits, bookstore events, and activities that educators and parents can access. Do you have an educator guide?
Jessica: I had a fun launch event at my favorite local independent children’s bookstore, Cover to Cover Books for Kids. In the month of November, I’ll be at the Buckeye Book Fair in Wooster, OH on Saturday, November 1 and at Books By the Banks in Cincinnati on Saturday, November 15. Technically, I’m promoting another book at these events (Wild Wonderings: Scientists and Their Questions), but I’ll have a display copy of So Rude! and ordering information for those who are interested.
Ironically, even though I’m a teacher, I haven’t created educator guides for my books. Perhaps I need to consider that as a future project.
About Jessica Frie-Gaither
Jessica is an experienced science educator and an award-winning author of books for students and teachers. Her titles include So Rude: Animals Behaving Badly, Nature's Rule Breakers: Creatures That Don't Fit In, Notable Notebooks: Scientists and Their Writings, Exemplary Evidence: Scientists and Their Data, Wild Wonderings: Scientists and Their Questions, and Science Notebooks in Student-Centered Classrooms. She is currently a 2024-2025 Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellow at the Library of Congress.
Jessica's Social Media Contacts
www.jessicafriesgaither.com
https://www.facebook.com/jfriesgaither
Instagram @JessicaFGWrites
BlueSky: @jessicafgwrites.bsky.social
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jessica-fries-gaither-14407233/
How two small changes turned a fun Halloween contest into a surprisingly deep writing experience.
The room was almost dark.
Two Alexa speakers whispered haunting music while the LED lights stretched like a ghostly ribbon across the tops of the bookshelves.
Creepy images from the Canva slides flickered on the screen, each one timed perfectly with the soundscape.
Fifth graders slipped into the library wide-eyed and whispering, unsure whether they were entering a classroom or a movie set.
For the next two weeks, this was our world.
Last year, our library’s two-sentence scary story contest took on a life of its own.
More than 170 entries poured in, and for weeks the space buzzed with creative energy.
Kids who rarely set foot inside were suddenly huddled over iPads, whispering eerie ideas and cracking nervous smiles.
It was one of those lightning-in-a-bottle moments that every teacher quietly hopes for.
But when the excitement faded, I found myself wondering: what if it could be more?
The contest had been fun, but I wanted to turn all that spooky enthusiasm into something lasting.
Many stories leaned on shock value or gore.
I wanted to see what would happen if we aimed for something smarter, quieter, and more psychological.
So I made two changes.
First, every story had to be 25 words or fewer.
Second, I turned the contest into a four-part writing workshop called The Blueprint for a Scare.
Instead of sending out a Google Form and hoping for the best, every fifth-grade class came to the library to collaboratively build their stories.
And that’s when everything shifted.
For two weeks, the library underwent a transformation. The lights were low. Spooky music played. The air hummed with imagination.
We weren’t just talking about writing anymore—we were making it.
Session 1: Deconstructing the Scare
We became Story Detectives. Together we noticed that every great short scare has three parts: a Setting that feels off or lonely, an Uncanny Character who isn’t quite right, and a Twist—the moment everything tilts.
Session 2: Brainstorming the Blueprint
This was all about freedom. I gave them a handful of What if... prompts (“What if your reflection didn’t copy you?”) and told them to just see where their minds wandered. They filled pages with eerie openings and half-formed story seeds. The goal wasn’t perfection. It was play.
Session 3: Forging the Twist
Here came the challenge: 25 words. No more. Every word had to earn its place.
We worked like editors, tightening sentences and swapping ordinary words for better ones. I modeled with “good vs. great” examples on the board.
We turned “Mom tucked me in twice tonight. The second one didn’t smell like her.” into “Mom tucked me in twice tonight. Then I heard my real mom calling from downstairs.”
That’s when it clicked. They could feel what strong writing sounds like.
Session 4: The Horror Showcase
The final day was hushed and electric. Students polished their stories, checked word counts, and submitted them through a QR code.
Then we dimmed the lights and shared.
Prizes were waiting, and yes—they were thrilled about those.
But what stayed with me was something deeper. They had felt the process of writing in a new way.
Many realized, maybe for the first time, that a story isn’t about length or shock value. It’s about choices. Word by word, moment by moment.
They discovered truths that will follow them into every piece of writing they do.
“A whisper can be scarier than a scream.”
That 25-word limit I worried might hold them back? It set them free.
With less space, they learned to imply rather than explain.
A whisper could be scarier than a scream.
A flicker could say more than a paragraph.
The constraint didn’t shrink their creativity. It sharpened it.
The contest became a small writing lab—part language, part rhythm, part courage.
When we finally read the stories aloud, the library filled with gasps and laughter.
It didn’t feel like Halloween anymore. It felt like discovery.
In the end, the monsters and ghosts were never the point.
It was about what happens when young writers feel their own power.
The courage to whisper a story into the room and hear someone gasp.
That small spark of connection—that’s the real magic.
What lingers for you after a moment of shared creativity—the product, or the process?
![]() |
| Lynne Marie |
This year, banned books really need a week. Or a month or more.
What is Banned Books Week?
Banned Books Week is a time to "highlight the value of free and open access to information" and fighting censorship. The coalition of organizations sponsoring it work to defend our freedom of expression: The American Library Association (ALA), Authors Guild, PEN America, and many others. The 2025 theme is "Censorship Is So 1984."